<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coaching History: 1998 Book – The Dos and Don’ts of Work Team Coaching</title>
	<atom:link href="http://coachingcommons.org/featured/coaching-history-1998-book-%e2%80%93-the-dos-and-don%e2%80%99ts-of-work-team-coaching/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://coachingcommons.org/featured/coaching-history-1998-book-%e2%80%93-the-dos-and-don%e2%80%99ts-of-work-team-coaching/</link>
	<description>Where Radical Possibilities are Explored &#38; Pursued</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 11:20:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy C H Teoh</title>
		<link>http://coachingcommons.org/featured/coaching-history-1998-book-%e2%80%93-the-dos-and-don%e2%80%99ts-of-work-team-coaching/comment-page-1/#comment-7487</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy C H Teoh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 23:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coachingcommons.org/?p=12195#comment-7487</guid>
		<description>There will always be different &#039;interpretations&#039; of how coaching should or should not be, whether in one-to-one, group or team coaching.

Take for example of an evaluation of a coach &#039;competence&#039;. 

One evaluator seeked out whether the coach is following a linear approach i.e. line of question must strictly follow a set sequence - G.R.O.W (mapping the coaching conversation); while another is seeking out the &#039;energy flow&#039; i.e. the dance of the coaching conversation though ultimately following the sequence -G.R.O.W (not necessarily mapping the coaching conversation - hence difficult to capture the conversation flow).

There is disagreement on the evaluation of the coach performance rating. 

Which evaluator in your opinion is correct in his/her evaluation?


Billy C H Teoh
Malaysia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There will always be different &#8216;interpretations&#8217; of how coaching should or should not be, whether in one-to-one, group or team coaching.</p>
<p>Take for example of an evaluation of a coach &#8216;competence&#8217;. </p>
<p>One evaluator seeked out whether the coach is following a linear approach i.e. line of question must strictly follow a set sequence &#8211; G.R.O.W (mapping the coaching conversation); while another is seeking out the &#8216;energy flow&#8217; i.e. the dance of the coaching conversation though ultimately following the sequence -G.R.O.W (not necessarily mapping the coaching conversation &#8211; hence difficult to capture the conversation flow).</p>
<p>There is disagreement on the evaluation of the coach performance rating. </p>
<p>Which evaluator in your opinion is correct in his/her evaluation?</p>
<p>Billy C H Teoh<br />
Malaysia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

